Tseng vs. The Head
|
09-08-2013, 05:39 PM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Tseng vs. The Head
(09-08-2013 09:44 AM)contrarymary Wrote: In her quest to restore her winning ways, Yani tugged a long approach on a par 5 hole at the Safeway classic. The ball found its way to what appeared to be a restroom facility - a permanent building. She and her caddie appeared puzzled by the ruling that did not permit them "line of sight" relief. I'm not sure if Code 1 eliminates the confusion between immovable and movable obstructions, but I would like to see that done. Any feature that isn't an integral part of the golf course - and I would like to see that defined as soil, sand or growing plants - or at least something along those lines. That sounds like an issue between Temporary Immovable Obstructions and Immovable Obstructions -- do you have a suggestion? Would you want to grant relief from intervention on the line of play for (non-temporary) immovable obstructions? The puzzlement here sounds like it has the usual cause -- player ignorance. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Messages In This Thread |
Tseng vs. The Head - contrarymary - 09-08-2013, 09:44 AM
RE: Tseng vs. The Head - Johanna - 09-08-2013, 11:17 AM
RE: Tseng vs. The Head - DavidHayes - 09-08-2013 05:39 PM
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)