Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Code One General Comments
08-10-2013, 01:29 AM (This post was last modified: 08-10-2013 04:09 AM by Simonko.)
Post: #4
RE: Code One General Comments
(08-08-2013 05:02 PM)DocMiller Wrote:  10 R17-2b, Exception: just a general observation, why isn’t gravity included as some other agency? Sometimes, even a ball replaced on the putting green simply moves as the grass underneath gives way to the pull of gravity. It is “known” when there is direct observation. It is “virtually certain” when all other reasonable possibilities are eliminated. Sometimes the strength of the grass simply times out. Gravity is equally as relentless a force as the wind or water. Since wind cannot be directly observed, it need not receive more credit than does gravity.

Apart from gravity being constant throughout, I'd suggest it isn't an exception (both in the revised 18-2b/11 and in Code One) because the possibility that movement was due to the grounded club can't be sufficiently eliminated for VC to be established.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Code One General Comments - DocMiller - 08-08-2013, 05:02 PM
RE: Code One General Comments - DavidHayes - 08-09-2013, 02:37 PM
RE: Code One General Comments - Simonko - 08-10-2013 01:29 AM
RE: Code One General Comments - Toni - 08-10-2013, 04:34 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)

Contact Us | Simple Golf Rules | Return to Top | Return to Content | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication