Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Code Two
07-31-2013, 05:16 AM
Post: #1
Code Two
Its a radical idea to mesh the rules with Stableford, much of which makes sense. However, I don't think it would ever fly. Instead, what may happen is a strong pull for bifurcation with USGA events played under old rules and many club events etc played under new rules. It could lead to as much confusion as the current rules do. That said I do like the elimination of provisional balls, varied ways to play in and lateral hazards for two reasons. These are some of the main areas where golfers get it wrong and second, the game would be quicker.

One important aspect about speed of play needs to be addressed if the idea of Stableford is to be be fully embraced. That is handicapping. The USGA needs to drop the concept of all rounds count for handicapping. Once the player is free of this idea, it isn't so painful just to pick up and move on - which Stableford encourages. Otherwise, there could be some quibbling about nil point went a ball is lost. Guys will begrudge not having the opportunity to save that 1 point - something also very critical to Stableford.


In any case, I do think you are on the right track. The rules of golf need to be simplified, I don't think there is any question about that.

Well done and keep plugging away.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Code Two - El Gringo - 07-31-2013 05:16 AM
RE: Code Two - DonLilley - 07-31-2013, 06:00 AM
RE: Code Two - John Morrissett - 07-31-2013, 05:22 PM
RE: Code Two - DonLilley - 07-31-2013, 05:41 PM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)

Contact Us | Simple Golf Rules | Return to Top | Return to Content | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication